Idea #1) Cast Your Fate the Wind
If you set out to invent a better wind turbine, and you fail, have you failed? What if there’s no such thing as a better wind turbine? What if the best wind turbine that could possibly be invented has already been invented? In this case, you set out to answer a question that had no answer, and guess what… you didn’t find an answer. Inventors don’t have crystal balls. 9 times out of 10 there’s no way to know in advance whether the dream machine you seek exists in this universe. If it doesn’t exist, then you shouldn’t judge yourself a failed inventor for not finding it. That would be like criticizing yourself for not finding a hundred dollar bill in an empty box.
The act of inventing is an act of risk. I suggest you realize at the outset that what you seek may not exist, and all of your blood, sweat, and tears could amount to absolutely nothing.
Of course, if inventing is a labor of love, then inventing for the sake of inventing can be a very rewarding experience. Sometimes the love runs deep enough to kindle a desire to put your ideas into the public domain. Who knows… you might leave the world a better place, or simply make it more beautiful and interesting. Just as the song of the robin makes the world infinitely more intriguing, a bizarre, cool, or sexy invention can entertain, amuse, and educate, even if it is never actually built. Heck, one of my own favorite inventions was a continuously variable transmission that didn’t even work. (It turned out to be incapable of transmitting torque to the output shaft.) To this day I maintain that one the most stoopernamous qualities of the human race is the way it insists on turning its back on perfectly good inventions simply because they don’t work.
Idea #2) Role Reversal
I had some friends in the countryside of Kentucky that liked to carve wind turbines from Coke bottles while sipping an ice cold beer on the back porch and telling about the 400 pound fish they caught and almost wrestled to the shore before being knocked cold by a swash of his tail fin. This is the type of bottle they’d use (one of the big ones):
Next, they’d use a razor blade to make long vertical cuts all around the circumference of the bottle:
Next, they would twist each “panel” existing between each vertical cut. Each panel would be twisted about 45 degrees in the same direction (either clockwise or counterclockwise). Now an aerial view of the bottle looked something like this:
Finally, they’d run a copper wire right down the longitudinal axis of the bottle. Then they suspended the bottle between two limbs of a tree so that it could spin about a vertical axis:
These little devices were amazing because they would spin so fast. I couldn’t help being fascinated by them. They seemed to be spinning faster than the wind. Of course, given that they are “drag” devices, I knew that they couldn’t possibly be spinning faster than the wind. And I knew that they were only curiosities because, as any educated wind turbine engineer knows, drag devices are “inferior” to lifting turbines.
However, I ultimately derived some benefit from my fascination with this “Coke Bottle Turbine”, because I used it in an invention trick I like to call “Role Reversal”. The result was a completely new type of wind turbine! You may recognize this machine from earlier blog posts:
Why do I call this “Role Reversal”? Because in the Coke Bottle Turbine, loosely speaking, the role of the panels is to spin. But in the Circular Wind Dam, the role of the panels (now brick walls) has been changed so that they are one of the stationary elements. They are used only to “collect” the wind and “direct” it towards the things that actually do spin.
As you can see, role reversal is a sloppy, loosely defined creative trick. It is completely unlike the formulaic approach to problem solving engineers become accustomed to after years and years of training. But I think inventing works best when you have a command of both formulaic discipline as well as the types of thinking that might be more closely associated with art than with science and technology.
Another example of role reversal? How about taking the torque from the high speed blade tip instead of from the low speed main turbine shaft? Here are two earlier posts that play with this idea: VAWT variation, HAWT variation.
Advantages of Role Reversal
One thing I really like about the role reversal idea is that it generates relevant ideas. The little bit I’ve read about brainstorming or creative thinking techniques seems to mostly involve the generation of random ideas, or ideas that are nearly random. But consider the Circular Wind Dam invention above. It was derived by redefining the role of the panels of the Coke Bottle Turbine. You can see that it is highly probable that the shape of the Coke Bottle Turbine panels may have application for other wind turbine designs. This is true because the Coke Bottle Turbine panels aren’t just random objects – they are objects that are designed to interact with the motion of the wind. So the probability that they may successfully play a different role in a new type of wind turbine is much higher than if I had simply chosen some shape at random, and then asked how that shape might be used to make a new kind of wind turbine.
Idea #3) Describe the Obvious, Then Challenge Your Description
Write down how your wind turbine works, then simply challenge each of the statements in your description. Start off simple. If you don’t get any good ideas by challenging a simple description, just repeat the process by writing another description with a little more detail. Then just keep getting more and more detailed until you either come up with something good or decide you’re on a dead-end road.
For example, here’s a really really simple explanation of how a vertical axis wind turbine works: “A few blades are attached to a vertical tower that is situated at the center of the blades. The blades and tower rotate as a unit”. You can hardly get the words of this ridiculously simple description onto the page before the question arises: “does the tower have to be at the center of the blades?” Clearly it does not:
Idea #4) Borrow from Distantly Related Disciplines
There are lots of little plastic “wind turbines” on YouTube. Many are, like the Coke Bottle Turbine pictured above, carved from plastic toys and bottles and such. These are curiosities – little plastic gadgets that spin in the wind for decoration. Wind turbines are among the most expensive, heaviest machines on earth. What could they possibly have in common with little plastic toys and gizmos made for half a cent apiece in Korea? And yet they do have something in common. Little plastic things often use the minimum amount of plastic possible, yet have the need to be mechanically stiff.
I saw a striking example of this yesterday as I sipped an ice cold Canadian Molson beer. It was a large size, fat can of beer, and it looked like this:
I didn’t cut the can open to see if the metal was any thicker at the part with ridges. Furthermore, I’m sure the ridged area derived much of its stiffness from the stiffer, thicker circle of metal at the very top of the can. But wouldn’t it at least be worth a second or two to stop and ask whether cost and weight could be removed from a wind turbine tower or blade spar through the use of a similar design?
Perhaps even the skin of the airfoil could be designed in this way. As a matter of fact, I’ve been seeing web pages about how they are adapting the hydrodynamics of a whale’s fin for the wind turbine application. (It has a vaguely similar ridged shape.) Having made the beer can observation, however, I almost wonder if a whale’s fin is shaped the way it is as much for the resulting mechanical properties as for the hydrodynamic properties.
Idea #5) Focus on Emerging Technologies
I worked in the wind industry about 10 years ago. At that time the field of power electronics was exploding. Wind turbine technology made great strides during those years simply by incorporating the new power electronic devices that were being invented. This is the easiest and smartest way to improve technology. It’s like using a metal detector to comb a beach that has never been combed before by any other person. Naturally, your chances of finding treasure here are far far greater than combing a beach that has already been examined by thousands of talented people.
So why did a smart guy like me spend his time searching for new wind turbine configurations when brilliant minds have already been “combing this beach” for centuries? Well, there are a few answers. For one thing, I don’t work in the wind industry anymore, and for another, I don’t have access to inside information about relevant emerging technologies (like materials science?). But even if you find yourself smack in the middle of the hottest emerging technologies, I think this blog can still be useful to you. This is true because there’s no reason why you can’t apply some of the “How I Invent Wind Turbines” tricks explained here to the adaptation and incorporation of the emerging technologies.
There is also the “second wave” of new technology incorporation to consider. For example, after the adaptation and integration of power electronics that happened in wind 10 years ago, each turbine was left with its own power electronic controller. I don’t know where the industry stands on this issue today, but suppose that it’s still the case that each turbine has its own power electronics. You might choose to tackle a problem that is a little bit more like combing that beach a second time with your metal detector. You may attempt to develop a way to have only a single power electronic controller synthesize clean 50 or 60 Hz power for the entire wind farm, thus sparing each wind turbine from having to have its own separate power electronic controller. Each time you run your metal detector over that beach, you will have to use more tricks and ingenuity to come up with a viable answer, and that is one of the reasons why I am sharing the tricks that work for me.
Idea #6) Thinking WAY Outside the Box
Inventing is a social act. Most people are embarrassed by thinking outside of the box. Why? Fear of making mistakes? Fear of being laughed at? I don’t know. But I can imagine that if thinking outside of the box is embarrassing, then thinking way outside the box must be unbearable. And why would anyone want to come up with ridiculous ideas anyway?
Ridiculous ideas are like stones in a river. You stand on one side of the river, squarely inside the box, longing to be the genius that can cross to that oh-so-cool and sexy unconventional solution that lies on the other side of the river. You can’t walk on water, but sometimes you can step on the stones that protrude from the water and walk all the way across to the other side. The stones are the ridiculous ideas. The stones are often the ideas that are so far out of the box that you would never want to admit to anyone that you could have thought of such a stupid idea.
In my own inventing, I have found that sometimes the path illustrated below is impossible for me to follow:
But sometimes I have been able to reach the cool solution by following a path like this:
Instinctively, I want to say that this approach works well for intractable, practically unsolvable problems – problems like homelessness, pollution, or improving the age-old three-blades-on-a-tower wind turbine design. Don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying I’ve succeeded with this approach. I don’t know if any of the wind turbine designs posted here are even worth the time it would take to develop a computer simulation of their performance. I’m only sharing with you the Salient White Elephant experience.
Idea #7) Ridiculous Ideas and the Argument of Extremes
In addition to the benefits of thinking way outside the box, there is another reason for entertaining ridiculous ideas. I call this technique the argument of extremes. The argument of extremes sometimes lets us use our intuition to answer a question that would normally require a more rigorous mathematical analysis. The best way to teach the argument of extremes technique is by example… so here we go.
Everybody knows an 18 wheeler (tractor trailer truck) needs more room to go around curves. Let’s suppose you’re learning to drive an 18 wheeler, and you want to understand this phenomenon. One of the first things you will learn is that the driver slides the wheels at the back end of the trailer forward or backwards to balance the weight of the stuff in the trailer:
So the question is – is it easier (and less dangerous) to go around a turn when the wheels are slid forward or backwards? We can answer this question by visualizing an argument of extremes. This means we imagine the two opposite extremes – wheels ridiculously far forward, and wheels ridiculously far backward. So we imagine a ridiculous tractor trailer. The tractor is normally sized, but the trailer is a whole block long! The wheels on this trailer can slide all the way forwards to the front of the trailer, and all the way backwards to the back of the trailer:
The two opposite extremes pictured above show that it can be difficult to make a turn in a tractor trailer truck regardless of where the wheels are. Both extremes are potentially hazardous.
So imagining extreme variations of our ideas can shed light how the ideas work, and often the exercise sharpens our intuition and allows us to sidestep mathematics.
Here’s another good example. The laws of fluid mechanics say that a wind turbine with a conically shaped shroud (flow concentrator or flow diffuser) has only limited value because there is a limit on the benefits of making the shroud larger and larger. This is true because you can only squeeze a limited amount of “extra” wind through the hole at the smaller end of the cone. Do you believe this? Is it intuitive? I believe it, and I’ll tell you why. Imagine a giant cone; larger end opening toward the wind, and the vertex of the cone on the downwind side (a “flow concentrator”). The vertex of the cone doesn’t have a hole, but we’ll use a sewing needle to puncture it so that it has just a tiny little hole. Do you think all of the wind in the approaching streamtube that is the size of the large opening will be forced through that tiny hole at the other end? No. At this extreme, our intuition kicks in and we realize that 99.9% of the approaching wind will veer around the cone altogether, almost as if it didn’t have a smaller hole. If this were not so, you could make a cone out of porous paper (with no hole at the vertex), hold it up to the wind with the vertex downwind, and feel no resistance to the approaching wind. Imagining these ridiculous extremes helps us to get an intuitive feeling of the effects of the wind’s viscosity.
A word of advice – the argument of extremes can be difficult to apply. It takes a lot of practice to get good at it. But in my experience, the effort has been well rewarded, as you can sometimes gain a very powerful perspective on a very difficult problem if you can only correctly apply the argument of extremes.
Idea #8) Reject Bad Ideas to Make Room for Good Ideas, Reject Good Ideas to Make Room for Genius
The Bible says that “there is nothing new under the sun”. This may be true, but God has filled the world with so many mysteries that you haven’t seen more than about 1% of them. A good inventor is like a newborn baby who is thrilled in knowing that there is a whole universe of things out there that he has yet to witness or understand. The upshot of this attitude is that there is always a new and better way to do something.
If you have a bad invention, and you want a good one, then you have to reject the bad idea. What this means to me is simply that you have to be dissatisfied with the bad idea, and go on inventing new and better wind turbines. Pretty soon you’ll have a good design. But don’t stop there – be dissatisfied with the good design, keep on inventing, and pretty soon you’ll have an even better one!
Part of the process I’m describing involves evaluating your inventions. Is an invention bad, good, and if it’s good, how good is it? Comparing two inventions, which one is better? Most technical people know how to evaluate designs, so I won’t address this subject except to say that sometimes we are guilty of omitting feelings from the evaluation. Gut instinct is valuable. Maybe it looks good on paper, but it just doesn’t feel right. Ask how the frontal lobotomy ever became a socially accepted phenomenon? Yes, maybe there were philosophical or technical arguments that cast the practice into a favorable light, but how could anyone have ever felt good about it? I suspect that if feelings had been taken into consideration, someone would have concluded that as much as the scientific community genuinely wanted to help mentally ill people, they just hadn’t figured out how to go about that helping yet. One of the most difficult aspects of being an inventor is the nearly daily diet of sour stomachs you must suffer through on your journey to discover something that feels right. But don’t despair. If you can reject an idea that doesn’t feel good, then you’ll eventually get to experience that wonderful feeling of knowing you’ve hit on something that has genuine value. And if you can go on suffering the embarrassment of bad inventions even after you have a good one, you may just turn out to be one of those rarely fortunate individuals who, at the least expected moment, is touched by an angel. Then you will stare in wonder at the fruit of your labor, knowing that after all of your searching, all of your suffering, you’ve discovered a design that could only be called genius.
So where does it end? When is a design good enough? Well… you may have plenty of designs that are not just good enough, but that are excellent, and that you should be proud of. But the quality of your designs is irrelevant. Inventors invent. When do you stop trying to design a better wind turbine? Never. Why would you stop looking when there is always a cooler wind machine out there? Why would you end your fascinating journey when there are are more new wind turbines to be discovered than there are stars in the sky?
Idea #9) Teamwork is More Powerful Than Genius
It is unfortunate that the patent system has spawned such a secretive work ethic. Teamwork and collaboration are very very powerful ways to increase both the speed with which you can come up with creative ideas, as well as the scope of those ideas. Consider how powerful it is to have Wikipedia at your fingertips. Isn’t it like having a professor by your side who seems to know just about everything, and who shares information freely without worrying about patents? I can’t tell you how much faster I work when I have access to Wikipedia.
Unfortunately, about the only place in private industry where you see teams of people solving problems is in the open source software movement. So if you attempt to find ways to get non-software people to play as a team, be ready for a challenge! That secretive work ethic has been in place for a long long time, and people will have a hard time adapting to a different way of doing things. You’ll probably have to come up with some kind of incentive for being a team player.
Idea #10) Read About Other Inventions
It never fails – as soon as you read about another invention or, better yet, see a picture of it, you’ll have several new ideas of your own. The best of all is, of course, to be able to witness the invention in person – to touch it, to watch it work, to get a feel for sizes, weights, and other important qualities. So don’t remain isolated for too long if you can help it. If you remain isolated, you’ll probably just end up inventing the same old ideas over and over. (Not to mention you will too frequently reinvent things that have already been invented.) If you can’t find an invention that relates to your field (for example, if you’ve already read about all the wind turbine inventions you can find), then find a related field and read about those inventions. Even unrelated fields can spark ideas that are useful to you. The point is that you want to see creativity in action. To a certain extent, you will absorb that jazzy way that inventors think just by seeing the innovative way they sidestepped a problem and found a solution.
Idea #11) Reinvent the Wheel
Don’t ever be discouraged if you discover that you invented something that has already been invented. Remind yourself that it takes just as much creativity for the second person to invent the invention as it took for the first person to invent it. Furthermore, you’ll never understand any technology as well as a technology you invented yourself, even if you were the second to invent it. So by reinventing the wheel you are learning to thoroughly understand your wheel, and this understanding will help you come up with more cool ideas in the future.
Also, if you are inventing for the sake of making the world a better place, then the “race” (to be the first) isn’t important. The only thing that is important is to come up with a good solid solution for the problem. I hope wind technology will one day produce the cheapest electricity in the world, regardless of who designs the technology. We need inventions like that, if for no other reason to encourage others who want to help make a better world.
To Be Continued… More Ideas on How to Invent
I hope to have more chances to post my tricks for inventing new wind turbine designs. I’ve got lots and lots of tricks to tell you about, but unfortunately it’s really hard for me to get time to post to this blog anymore. We’ll just have to see what happens…